High court likely to say states cant levy excessive fines

(Associated Press) The Supreme Court left little doubt Wednesday that it would rule that the Constitutions ban on excessive fines applies to the states an outcome that could help an Indiana man recover the $40000 Land Rover police seized when they arrested him for selling about $400 worth of heroin. A decision in favor of 37-year-old Tyson Timbs of Marion Indiana also could buttress efforts to limit the confiscation by local law enforcement of property belonging to someone suspected of a crime. Police and prosecutors often keep the proceeds. Timbs was on hand at the high court for arguments that were largely a one-sided affair in which the main question appeared to be how broadly the state would lose. The court has formally held that most of the Bill of Rights applies to states as well as the federal government but it has not done so on the Eighth Amendments excessive-fines ban. Justice Neil Gorsuch was incredulous that Indiana Solicitor General Thomas Fisher was urging the justices to rule that states should not be held to the same standard.