What If The Third Debate Were Based On Different Polls?

(fivethirtyeight) The deadline to make the third Democratic primary debate has passed and thanks to harder qualifying rules just 10 candidates made the stage. This of course was unwelcome news among candidates such as billionaire activist Tom Steyer and Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard who were on the cusp of making the debate. Steyer needed just one more qualifying poll and Gabbard needed two. And this got us thinking: What would the debate stage look like if the list or type of eligible polls were different? Gabbard in particular has taken the Democratic National Committee to task for the specific pollsters included in its list of approved polling organizations arguing that had the list of pollsters been expanded she would have had at least 2 percent support in more than 20 polls conducted during the third debate qualification window. And in fairness to her understanding how the DNC determines its list of approved polling organizations can be confusing. Gabbard did hit 2 percent in YouGovs latest national survey sponsored by The Economist but it didnt count toward qualifying for the debate. So to better understand how including different pollsters or relying on different pollster methodologies could affect who made the debate stage we checked to see who would have qualified if: